新生招商

Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 500 Euros

September 2020 update. Upper class. Up until a few years ago, high-end smartphones were usually in the price range of between 500 and 600 USD/Euros, but this segment is now occupied by upper class models and older high-end smartphones. The latter might not be new anymore, but are still good alternatives.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum ( Andreas Osthoff),

Upper-class smartphones are located in the price range of between mainstream and high-end models and are targeted towards users who are not willing to pay more than 700 Euros (~$870) for an expensive high-end phone, but still want good performance, good cameras, and nice build quality.

新生招商The price range of up to 500 Euros (~$620) includes both powerful upper-class models as well as old high-end smartphones. The latter are an interesting alternative, because the specifications are usually still very good and often receive at least one major update. The following rankings might be interesting for you as well:

新生招商Here you will find a Top 10 ranking of smartphones under 500 Euros (~$620), which have been reviewed by Notebookcheck within the last 24 months. The market is constantly changing, so we are also looking forward to getting tips about good deals and other notes in the comments. You can sort the table by clicking the headers or via text filter (e.g. "Kirin").

Note: The cheapest street price at the time of the last revision of this article applies to the following list. The sales prices shown in the following table and in the price comparison with the individual articles are automatically updated daily and can therefore differ!

Best upper-class smartphones as of September 2020

Pos.
Date
Rating
Image
Model
Height
Weight
Size
Resolution
OS
Best Price
1
04/2020
87 %Huawei P40Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.5 mm175 g6.1"2340x1080Android 10
2
03/2019
87 %Samsung Galaxy S10Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.8 mm157 g6.1"3040x1440Android 9.0 Pie
3
07/2020
86 %Xiaomi Poco F2 ProXiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm Adreno 650
6 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.9 mm219 g6.67"2400x1080Android 10
4
03/2019
86 %Xiaomi Mi 9Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.61 mm173 g6.39"2340x1080Android 9.0 Pie
5
11/2019
86 %Google Pixel 4Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.2 mm162 g5.7"2280x1080Android 10
6
07/2019
85 %LG G8s ThinQLG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.99 mm181 g6.2"2248x1080Android 9.0 Pie
7
05/2020
85 %Apple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
3 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
7.3 mm148 g4.7"1334x750Apple iOS 13
8
07/2019
85 %ZTE Axon 10 ProZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm178 g6.47"2340x1080Android 9.0 Pie
9
06/2017
85 %Samsung Galaxy S8Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
ARM Mali-G71 MP20
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8 mm155 g5.8"2960x1440Android 7.0 Nougat
10
04/2018
85 %Samsung Galaxy S9Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.5 mm163 g5.8"2960x1440Android 8.0 Oreo

Top 10 smartphones from the last months, current reviews listed first aktuelle Tests zuerst
Link: 

Editors' Comments

Huawei’s P40 and the Poco F2 Pro are this month’s new-entries with the realme X3 barely failing to make the list. We are excited to see how well the LG Velvet 5G新生招商 is going to perform.

1st – Huawei P40

Huawei P40

With its 6.1-inch large OLED display Huawei's P40新生招商 is a comparatively compact smartphone with powerful components. It is powered by a Kirin 990 5G with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, the latter of which can be expanded via nano memory card. In addition to Wi-Fi 6 and 5G the P40 also supports a wide variety of LTE bands, and should thus be able to connect to networks world-wide.

新生招商The camera is not as sophisticated as it is on the Pro model with the same moniker. However, its main sensor remained identical, albeit it lacks the former’s OIS. The zoom lens (3x optical, 5x hybrid, 30x digital) continues to feature optical image stabilization. The third lens on this triple-camera array is an ultra-wide angle lens.

In our test, the P40 performed fairly well and did not exhibit any major flaws. The smartphone is only protected against splash water, and it lacks support for wireless charging. Like all recent Huawei smartphones it also lacks Google’s services.

Pricecompare

2nd - Samsung Galaxy S10

Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Galaxy S10

The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a 6.1-inch Curved Dynamic AMOLED display, where the front glass is only interrupted by a gap for the two front cameras. Depending on the model, you either get a ceramic or glass rear cover (Gorilla Glass 5). The frame is always made of stainless steel and results in a very sophisticated impression.

新生招商The Galaxy smartphone is powered by a fast Exynos 9820 SoC in combination with 8 GB RAM and up to 512 GB internal storage, which is expandable via microSD card. You will usually get the 128 GB SKU for less than 500 Euros. Fast LTE and Wi-Fi 6 are also included, while other connectivity includes Bluetooth 5.0 with dual-audio, MST, Ant+, and NFC. The list of features is pretty complete and it also supports wireless charging in both directions, so you can also charge other devices with your smartphone via induction. We also like the versatile cameras, even though the results are not perfect.

There are not many drawbacks. The battery runtimes during the review were not great and is is not very enduring in everyday situations, either. The facial recognition is certainly not as secure as a high quality 3D recognition, and the Korean manufacturer still does not include aptX HD for its high-end smartphone.

Pricecompare

3rd – Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro

Poco F2 Pro

The Poco F2 Pro新生招商 is Xiaomi’s attempt to continue the first Pocophone’s legacy, which offered flagship quality components at mid-range prices. It comes with an extremely bright super AMOLED display with decent color accuracy and support for HDR content running at 60 Hz. The smartphone is powered by a Snapdragon 865 with either 6 or 8 GB of RAM and either 128 or 256 GB of non-expandable storage. It continues to feature an IR blaster as well as a 3.5-inch headphone jack.

新生招商The smartphone’s quad-camera array performed fairly well in our test. Unfortunately, it lacks optical zoom capabilities, and the ultra-wide angle lens was not the greatest either. In return, premium features such as IP certification and wireless charging, are supported.

Pricecompare

4th - Xiaomi Mi 9

Xiaomi Mi 9
Xiaomi Mi 9

The Xiaomi Mi 9新生招商 is a powerful smartphone with high-end ambitions for a very good price. It does not only offer a very big 6.39-inch AMOLED screen (16.23 cm, 100.2 cm²), but also a bright backlight and well-balanced colors. If you select the global ROM SKU, you also get the required DRM certification to stream corresponding contents in HD, which was not a matter of course for previous Xiaomi smartphones. 

The Mi 9 is shipped with powerful hardware including a Snapdragon 855, 6 GB RAM and 64 or 128 GB internal storage. However, you cannot expand the storage, so you should not save money at the wrong end. We also liked the camera during our review and the battery runtime is okay, despite the comparatively small battery.

Pricecompare

5th – Google Pixel 4

Google Pixel 4

The Google Pixel 4 has dropped in price significantly over the past few months, and it has quite a lot to offer: 5.7-inch 90 Hz OLED display, fast SoC, IP68 certification, wireless charging, 3D face detection, and last but not last the guarantee that it will receive updates for a very long time.

Its dual-lens camera performed very well in our test, particularly its main camera with the additional 2x optical zoom. The speakers were also one of its highlights.

The biggest downside is without a doubt the fact that storage is not expandable, which is particularly troublesome for the 64 GB SKU.

Pricecompare

6th - LG G8s ThinQ

LG G8s ThinQ

The LG G8s ThinQ offers everything you expect from a modern smartphone. The 6.2-inch P-OLED screen has a resolution of 2248 x 1080 pixels and comes with a comparatively wide notch, which looks similar to the iPhone. However, this notch contains the real highlight of the smartphone – a ToF sensor from Infineon. It does not only enable better portraits and perhaps the fastest 3D facial recognition right now, but also wireless gesture controls. The latter is a good idea from LG, but the handling takes time getting used to and the functionality is still limited.

At the back you get a triple-camera with an additional ultra wide-angle as well as a telephoto. The battery capacity is comparatively small with 3550 mAh, but LG still manages to squeeze good runtimes out of it. The smartphone is also protected against dust and water according to IP68, has passed 14 tests according to the military standard MIL-STD 810G and supports wireless charging. A pretty complete package for less than 500 Euros.

Pricecompare

7th – Apple iPhone SE (2020)

Apple iPhone SE2
Apple iPhone SE2

Apple’s Apple iPhone SE (2020) is based on the iPhone 8 and features the exact same case with identical footprint and somewhat antiquated display to body ratio. In return, its internal hardware is up to date as it features Apple’s fastest currently available SoC as well as numerous other noteworthy features, such as Wi-Fi 6, wireless charging, or an IP67 certification.

新生招商All in all Apple did a great job with the SE2, but it is not free of disappointments, namely the included power supply, the fairly limited single-lens camera, and its below average call quality.

Pricecompare

8th - ZTE Axon 10 Pro

ZTE Axon 10 Pro

The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features good specs with its 6.47-inch AMOLED screen (FHD+), a fast Snapdragon 855 with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal storage, which can be expanded. The 48 MP main camera is supported by an ultra wide-angle as well as a telephoto to ensure good picture quality.

The 4000 mAh battery ensures long battery runtimes and can be quickly charged via cable, but wireless charging is also supported. Only the panel brightness could have been higher.

Pricecompare

9th - Samsung Galaxy S8

Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S8

The price of the Samsung Galaxy S8 dropped significantly. The original RRP was 799 Euros, but you can now get it for less than 500 Euros since the successor is available. You get a fast SoC, 4 GB RAM, and 64 GB UFS 2.1 storage, which is a powerful package for the high-end product. The displays were once again improved while the bezels are slimmer. Samsung also uses the 2.06:1 aspect ratio for the S8, so the diagonal size can grow without the need for a wider device. This is also the only significant difference between the two models. The Galaxy S8 uses a 5.8-inch Super-AMOLED panel and the S8+ a 6.2-inch screen. The battery capacities differ as well, but the S8+ cannot benefit from the additional juice during our tests. Still, the S8-series offers a great set of features: LTE Cat. 16, Bluetooth 5.0, storage expansion via microSD, IP68 certification, USB 3.1 with DisplayPort support, fingerprint and Iris scanner, as well as many more.

We did find some drawbacks like the bad position of the fingerprint scanner on the Plus model and the long-term construction site Bixby. The main camera is also identical to the predecessor. So if you want to save some money without making compromises on the camera quality, you can just get the Galaxy S7 Edge or Galaxy S7. The latter is even the only alternative if you prefer a display without an Edge-display.

Pricecompare

10th - Samsung Galaxy S9

Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Galaxy S9

Samsung's Galaxy S9新生招商 is once again a powerful smartphone, but there are only small changes compared to the previous model. The hardware specs are very good with a new and powerful Exynos SoC, 4 GB RAM and 64/256 GB of UFS 2.1 storage. The display was slightly tuned as well and the bezels, which were slim to begin with, are even smaller than before. Otherwise, the S9-series offers great features as well: LTE Cat. 18, Bluetooth 5.0, storage expansion via microSD, IP67 certification, wireless charging, USB 3.1 with DisplayPort support, a fingerprint as well as Iris scanner and more. This also includes a new dual-camera, which can automatically switch between an f/1.5 and f/2.4 aperture depending on the lighting conditions and takes great pictures.

Thanks to the update to Android 9.0 Pie and the One UI, Bixby now finally supports German. The Samsung smartphone also gets a bit bigger and heavier. The battery is identical to the previous model, but the battery runtime is still not very convincing and worse than its predecessor. It is also unfortunate that the Korean company only equips the Galaxy S9 with a single-camera solution. One fact that is only rarely talked about: The Galaxy S9 is much better protected against drops than before.

Pricecompare

Best Smartphones under 500 Euros in Comparison

Size Comparison

163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 219 g0.4828 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 73.4 mm / 2.89 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 178 g0.3924 lbs157.5 mm / 6.2 inch 74.67 mm / 2.94 inch 7.61 mm / 0.2996 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs155.3 mm / 6.11 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 7.99 mm / 0.3146 inch 181 g0.399 lbs149.9 mm / 5.9 inch 70.4 mm / 2.77 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 157 g0.3461 lbs148.9 mm / 5.86 inch 71.1 mm / 2.8 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 175 g0.3858 lbs148.9 mm / 5.86 inch 68.1 mm / 2.68 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 155 g0.3417 lbs147.7 mm / 5.81 inch 68.7 mm / 2.7 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 163 g0.3594 lbs147.1 mm / 5.79 inch 68.8 mm / 2.71 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 162 g0.3571 lbs138.4 mm / 5.45 inch 67.3 mm / 2.65 inch 7.3 mm / 0.2874 inch 148 g0.3263 lbs

Test Results

Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (3, 5)
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
10 (5, 5)
4.4 (2.4, 2)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
8 (3, 5)
36.8 (9.2, 27.6)
3.6 (2, 1.6)
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
8 (3, 5)
Response Time Black / White *
6 (3, 3)
4 (2, 2)
8 (5, 3)
4 (2, 2)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
6 (3, 3)
21.2 (6, 15.2)
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
6 (3, 3)
PWM Frequency
245
240.4 (99)
177.3
245.1 (99)
367.6
235
277.8 (99)
250
240.4
Screen
Brightness middle
583
701
799
593
554
539
688
402
566
529
Brightness
593
705
801
587
550
556
659
399
564
527
Brightness Distribution
94
98
97
94
94
88
92
92
94
96
Black Level *
0.28
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.03
3.7
1.46
0.9
0.8
3.78
1
4.1
2.7
1.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.33
10.3
2.92
2
1.4
6.95
2.2
6.5
5.4
4
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.4
2.7
1.5
1.3
2.2
1.7
3.7
3.1
1.6
Gamma
2.301 96%
2.1 105%
2.237 98%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.274 97%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
CCT
6621 98%
6553 99%
6003 108%
6548 99%
6213 105%
6013 108%
6790 96%
7841 83%
6335 103%
6358 102%
Contrast
2457
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
39.9
37.4
42.3
31.8
35.5
38
40.5
41.4
36.7
35.4
Maximum Bottom *
41.3
37.3
40.1
30.9
34.5
38.4
41.4
40.9
37.5
36.2
Idle Upper Side *
31.5
28.8
34.5
28.3
27.2
33.7
36
28.8
26.7
23.2
Idle Bottom *
30.8
27.8
32.3
27.8
26.9
32.4
31.4
27.5
26.2
22.7
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
2063
1259
1954
1650
1007
1689
1938
1927
1667
1182
WiFi v1.3
806
427
923
546
460
693
694
680
719
474
Load
236
170
286
194
185
203
143
217
264
164
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
1
0.61
2
0.67
1.01
1.2
0.44
0.76
0.78
0.65
Idle Average *
1.9
1.27
3.1
1.26
1.63
1.6
1.56
1.15
1.1
0.81
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.3
4
1.29
1.69
2
1.63
1.18
1.16
0.92
Load Average *
3.5
6.17
6.4
3.71
4.67
5
2.32
3.95
4.15
4.76
Load Maximum *
6.9
8.55
11.6
9.3
8.78
10
4.12
7.49
5.12
5.16

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2988 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3399 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2856 Points ∼23%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2573 Points ∼21%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2666 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
3281 Points ∼27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2752 Points ∼22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
755 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
923 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
742 Points ∼46%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
746 Points ∼46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
746 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
1336 Points ∼83%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
751 Points ∼46%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10162 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13569 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10999 Points ∼19%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10274 Points ∼18%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10765 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6711 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8786 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4499 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4284 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3523 Points ∼52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3406 Points ∼51%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3476 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1997 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3688 Points ∼55%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4924 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2981 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5466 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3754 Points ∼47%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4112 Points ∼52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3309 Points ∼42%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2898 Points ∼36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4235 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2479 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2590 Points ∼33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6606 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5358 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9466 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7076 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6383 Points ∼64%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5184 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
7847 Points ∼78%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7083 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3584 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3697 Points ∼37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6140 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4551 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8145 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5913 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5685 Points ∼69%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4604 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
5688 Points ∼69%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6162 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3261 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3376 Points ∼41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4998 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3956 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3788 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4072 Points ∼71%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3293 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4052 Points ∼70%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4120 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2454 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2650 Points ∼46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4293 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12547 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10291 Points ∼36%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9217 Points ∼32%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6358 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
20135 Points ∼70%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10279 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4908 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4843 Points ∼17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4432 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8652 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7449 Points ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7196 Points ∼53%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5268 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
10699 Points ∼80%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7716 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4016 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4091 Points ∼30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4242 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2854 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4958 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3758 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4199 Points ∼81%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3242 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2892 Points ∼56%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4093 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2494 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2486 Points ∼48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6244 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5176 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8365 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6355 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6214 Points ∼69%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6040 Points ∼67%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4573 Points ∼51%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6356 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3472 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3553 Points ∼39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5651 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4383 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7265 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5509 Points ∼27%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5615 Points ∼28%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5068 Points ∼25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4050 Points ∼20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5661 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3194 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3244 Points ∼16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4279 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3965 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3614 Points ∼69%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4540 Points ∼86%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3505 Points ∼66%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2857 Points ∼54%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3919 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2440 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2600 Points ∼49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3894 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11569 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9963 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8765 Points ∼61%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6122 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
9218 Points ∼65%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9932 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4923 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4569 Points ∼32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3973 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8215 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7166 Points ∼75%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7263 Points ∼76%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5251 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
6168 Points ∼65%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7407 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4015 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3911 Points ∼41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
22857 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31297 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28985 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25339 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37641 Points ∼44%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30972 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
33851 Points ∼39%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23877 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21543 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26851 Points ∼31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
66142 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
71292 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146854 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
106534 Points ∼20%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
102168 Points ∼19%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97354 Points ∼18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
209431 Points ∼38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
106799 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36347 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48433 Points ∼9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
46552 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55524 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76099 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
62225 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
73984 Points ∼30%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65945 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
97290 Points ∼40%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60279 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31532 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41093 Points ∼17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
151 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
143 fps ∼1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
167 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
139 fps ∼1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
85 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
250 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
166 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
121 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144 fps ∼1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
88 fps ∼3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
100 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
85 fps ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
125 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
100 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
75 fps ∼12%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
149 fps ∼24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
100 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
62 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
73 fps ∼12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
46 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67 fps ∼18%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼14%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45 fps ∼12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53 fps ∼1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
57 fps ∼1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
93 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
70 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
46 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
57 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼1%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
27 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼15%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼16%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
29 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼7%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
31 fps ∼13%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼7%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
42 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼18%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
49 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼7%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
72 fps ∼12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps ∼7%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
43 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps ∼10%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
34 fps ∼8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
59 fps ∼14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28 fps ∼6%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
36 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼14%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8736 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7595 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10347 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9035 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10254 Points ∼67%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9125 Points ∼60%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9664 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5370 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5291 Points ∼35%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11268 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9750 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12129 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10985 Points ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12190 Points ∼61%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11890 Points ∼59%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11857 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6035 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5736 Points ∼29%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1260 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1385 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1456 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1378 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1601 Points ∼79%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1171 Points ∼58%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1431 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1156 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points ∼54%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8634 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7361 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11736 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9270 Points ∼32%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9307 Points ∼32%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8414 Points ∼29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9361 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6096 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6373 Points ∼22%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6942 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4570 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8874 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4031 Points ∼45%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6458 Points ∼73%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4324 Points ∼49%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6253 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3039 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2669 Points ∼30%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8992 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7476 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10075 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8441 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8058 Points ∼49%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8718 Points ∼53%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8652 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5386 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6234 Points ∼38%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5105 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4320 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6273 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4595 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5277 Points ∼62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4389 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5188 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3277 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3285 Points ∼39%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
328111 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
374820 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341863 Points ∼60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
321145 Points ∼57%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371848 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
243861 Points ∼43%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269219 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
257246 Points ∼88%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249311 Points ∼85%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
254602 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
171884 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
217950 Points ∼74%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
66.4 MB/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64.8 MB/s ∼74%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
46.7 MB/s ∼54%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
66.83 MB/s ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53.5 MB/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67.18 MB/s ∼77%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
81.6 MB/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77.9 MB/s ∼81%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67.53 MB/s ∼70%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
88.2 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63.9 MB/s ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79.22 MB/s ∼82%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
197 MB/s ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24.44 MB/s ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226.45 MB/s ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165.32 MB/s ∼52%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
146.64 MB/s ∼46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.6 MB/s ∼9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189.53 MB/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15.25 MB/s ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23.07 MB/s ∼7%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
189.4 MB/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
137.4 MB/s ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
229.74 MB/s ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
149.36 MB/s ∼46%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122.38 MB/s ∼38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138 MB/s ∼43%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
150.36 MB/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127.17 MB/s ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
131 MB/s ∼40%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
212.9 MB/s ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.24 MB/s ∼21%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
721.95 MB/s ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388.27 MB/s ∼43%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247.73 MB/s ∼27%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
182.4 MB/s ∼20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503.04 MB/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.23 MB/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
206.94 MB/s ∼23%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1591.6 MB/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
831.94 MB/s ∼46%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1634.45 MB/s ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666.06 MB/s ∼37%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655.4 MB/s ∼36%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
791.1 MB/s ∼44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
768.93 MB/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
792.86 MB/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
815.43 MB/s ∼45%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
21348 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20286 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24369 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24534 Points ∼41%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22572 Points ∼38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23830 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
48991 Points ∼82%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25640 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12941 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15233 Points ∼26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2287 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1924.2 ms * ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1993.1 ms * ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1873.2 ms * ∼3%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2072.2 ms * ∼3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2036 ms * ∼3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
549.9 ms * ∼1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1851.7 ms * ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1886.6 ms * ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2077.8 ms * ∼3%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
257 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
325 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
194 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
163 Points ∼20%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
95 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
108 Points ∼41%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94 Points ∼35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
107 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
146 Points ∼55%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63 Points ∼24%

* ... smaller is better

/
Loading Comments
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 500 Euros
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2020-09-23)

 
新优平台代理 无极4app 新宝5娱乐招商 新宝GG 无极4注册哒哒8741878 新悦注册 无极5娱乐怎么注册 无极游戏怎么样 新火娱乐APP 新加坡彩票49选7官网 新火3娱乐 日博平台主管 新宝3招商 时时彩9.8倍那个网站 新宝4娱乐注册 昆仑娱乐开户 新宝2内部主管 无极4娱乐招商 无极5官网 新宝4游戏招商 新版赢八app 新宝3平台登陆 新火3娱乐平台 时时彩9.99的那个网站 无极3平台老板 无极账号 无极3主管82104 无极直播app 新宝4总代 旺彩计划